<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Review on Allanderek's blog</title><link>https://blog.poleprediction.com/tags/review/</link><description>Recent content in Review on Allanderek's blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.139.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.poleprediction.com/tags/review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Review: Mo Gawdat: Diary of a CEO</title><link>https://blog.poleprediction.com/posts/mo-gawdat-diary-of-a-ceo/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:33:44 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.poleprediction.com/posts/mo-gawdat-diary-of-a-ceo/</guid><description>&lt;p>I was asked to watch an episode of Steven Bartlett&amp;rsquo;s Diary of a CEO &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwlgFC6S-OE">featuring Mo Gawdat introduced as an Ex-Google officer available here&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>My main takeaway is that Mo Gawdat is largely operating out of his lane in this podcast episode. Though they are only briefly touched on, he does seem to have a grounding in economics / sociology. However, the episode is mostly focused on A.I. and alignment of super-intelligent A.I. I found the episode to be a very frustrating watch, the guest frequently evades the question being asked and dresses up his comments with confident sounding tics. He is also guilty of a &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy">motte-and-bailey argument&lt;/a> on multiple occasions where he makes a bold claim but retreats to a much less bold claim when challenged. At times the host attempts to challenge him, but on other occasions he gives very lowball questions.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>